Human cloning represents a moral threat to future generations

It would establish, as a condition of proceeding, the necessary regulatory protections to avoid abuses and misuses of cloned embryos. What makes that poem appealing is precisely its mysterious aspect that we cannot really give a proper name or a proper account of the relationship that is being described and yet for the most part we recognize it and many of us would value it and see its significance in a larger vision of the human story.

There currently exist alternative methods of scientific cell research that accomplish the same potential objectives without the need to clone a human embryo that will inevitably be faced with destruction.

Am I faithful to the question? Moreover, there is a place for research, including cloning, in the vegetable and animal kingdoms, wherever it answers a need or provides a significant benefit for man or for other living beings, provided that the rules for protecting the animal itself and the obligation to respect the biodiversity of species are observed.

Here is the essay, in full. As a form of unnatural asexual reproduction, it represents a radical manipulation of the constitutive relationship and complementarity that are at the origin of human procreation as a biological act and an exercise of human love.

Non-embryo destructive stem cell research on the other hand includes adult stem cells, which are derived from such sources as bone marrow, fetal tissue, and umbilical cord blood. The research shows great promise, and its actual value can only be determined by allowing it to go forward now. Complicating the national dialogue about human cloning is the isolation in of human embryonic stem cells, which many scientists believe to hold great promise for understanding and treating many chronic diseases and conditions.

I mean, that is very instructive because it is very hard as I think Stephen really beautifully said. Cells and tissues derived from adult stem cells and returned to the patient from whom they were taken would not be subject at least in principle to immune rejection.

Although the promise of such research is at this time unknown, most researchers believe it will yield very useful and important knowledge, pointing toward new therapies and offering one of several possible routes to circumvent the immune rejection problem.

The Pontiff emphasized that "science has now demonstrated" that the embryo "is a human individual who possesses his own identity from conception. Some scientists also believe that stem cells derived from cloned human embryos, produced explicitly for such research, might prove uniquely useful for studying many genetic diseases and devising novel therapies.

In this image of the family, the relationships and moral obligations of parents and children are not freely chosen, but are embedded in their biological and social contexts. And we shall have lost our best chance to do anything about it. Our children are, to begin with, our replacements, those who will one day stand in our place.

The theological perspective, beginning with the light which revelation sheds on the meaning of a human life and on the dignity of the person, supports and sustains human reason in regard to these conclusions, without in any way diminishing the validity of contributions based on rational evidence.

It is not one that would dismiss a discussion of consequences like the question whether the child born of processes — brought into being processes other than sexual reproduction can be loved. Each child thus stems from and unites exactly two lineages, lines that trace backward in similar branching fashion for ages.

Neither has it been sought explicitly as a tool for genetic control or "enhancement" of human offspring.

Debate: Ban on human reproductive cloning

In short, I do not think that a ban would in any way fundamentally be a threat to the future of scientific research here.

Furthermore, the distinction between the two implies that "therapeutic" cloning is not "reproductive," when both are in fact forms of reproduction - both create new human life.

The removal of human eggs through IVF and the subsequent fertilization of human embryos outside of the uterus also contributed to a scientific journey that culminates in stem cell research and cloning. And then, secondly, duplicative of what?

For cloning-to-produce-children, while it may be a potential aid to human reproduction, appears also to be a substitute for it, or at least for its natural, un-programmed, sexual character. Even if I am right about that and I grant that I understand you are not going to grant me that but even if I am right about that, I realize we could then have a debate about what does and does not constitute manufacture.

The rise of the computer age and the biotech revolution are finding and will find growing convergence in the remaking and commodification of the human. This image of the family and its place in the natural and social order was perhaps best articulated by Edmund Burke in this famous passage: This transition is not to suggest that the questions raised by Bioethics 1 have ceased or that they have lost their relevance, because they continue to challenge our common humanity on a daily basis.

In its biological aspects as a form of artificial reproduction, cloning is achieved without the contribution of two gametes; therefore it is an asexual and agamic reproduction. Genetic relation to only one parent might produce special difficulties for family life.

Many other nations have banned human cloning, and the United Nations is considering an international convention on the subject.

It seems to me you are just backing the question up a little. Now from there I am happy to have the debate but I wonder if even prior to that you guys get off the train and say, no, it really is just a matter of bringing efficient means to bear to ends that we have in mind.

That human cloning should always be opposed on moral grounds.

We received a great deal of public comment, oral and written. They might come to be considered more like products of a designed manufacturing process than "gifts" whom their parents are prepared to accept as they are. Speaking only for ourselves, we hold that this research, at least for the purposes presently contemplated, presents no special moral problems, and therefore should be endorsed with enthusiasm as a potential new means of gaining knowledge to serve humankind.

As a result, with such huge numbers against it, cloning on a large scale would likely trigger even more protests on top of those that already existespecially among Christian organizations.

By permanently banning cloning-to-produce-children, this policy gives force to the strong ethical verdict against cloning-to-produce-children, unanimous in this Council and in Congress and widely supported by the American people.

Since the founding of the United Nations, the centrality of the welfare and protection of all human beings to the work of this organization is beyond question. Some want to outlaw it, and many nations have done so.

I believe that our fundamental moral sentiments are acquired from the early family experience and I think there is a lot of data to support that.Below is an excerpt from the report on the moral case against cloning-to-produce-children and cloning-for-biomedical research.

-for-biomedical-research is a deeper violation of the meaning of the procreative act and the obligations we owe to future generations than cloning-to-produce-children. The Threat of Human Cloning: Ethics, Recent. Cloning Cloning: Right or Wrong? Cloning: Right or Wrong? on December 1, Alsothe fluffy white ‘lamb of innocence’ had become a symbol of threat to human society through an eerie new surrounds the ovary, and a slightly different technique.

These clones have also been cloned—and these again—three generations of healthy. Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry is the first publication of the President's Council on Bioethics, which was created by President George W.

Bush on November 28,by means of Executive Order Moral arguments against cloning are unfair to future human clones How would you feel if you were a clone and society considered your creation illegal and your existence deplorable? Our of respect for human clones (human beings in every respect), a ban on human cloning should be opposed.

Playing God by Manipulating Man: The Facts and Frauds of Human Cloning. Appendix To Presentation. Part 1: Partial List of Church (and other) Documents Relevant to Abortion, Human Embryo Research, Human Cloning, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Science, Law, The Media, etc.

The liberal view on some common issues in the moral debate about cloning. Article pected dysfunctions in the future human being. This presumption, although.

Human cloning represents a moral threat to future generations
Rated 5/5 based on 7 review